Have you ever wondered about the impact of a SPIFF? (That’s
a Sales Performance Incentive Ffund) . Does it really make a material
difference to sales performance? Should pre-sales engineers participate in a
SPIFF? What happens if you reverse a SPIFF and exclude Sales?
Well – this may not answer all of those questions – but it will lead you to some interesting conclusions. Here are the long-term results of a SPIFF program, paid out by an enterprise software company, over a 7 year period.
Here is the
Background
Every year (from 2007 through 2012) the company had a 2nd
quarter special where they incented part or all of the sales team to upgrade
existing customers to the latest release – and potentially cross-sell them an
additional module. They measured the amount of additional product sold as “product
pullthrough” – the last column. As I cannot reveal financials it is expressed
as a % of the installed base which is in direct proportion to revenue because
of their business model.
Well – this may not answer all of those questions – but it will lead you to some interesting conclusions. Here are the long-term results of a SPIFF program, paid out by an enterprise software company, over a 7 year period.
Bottom Line Up Front - Here is the Data
Year
|
Participants
|
SPIFF Design
|
Product Pull Through
|
2006
|
None
|
None
|
14.2%
|
2007
|
Sales only
|
1.5x quota credit
|
24.2%
|
2008
|
Sales only
|
Sell 500k , get 25k bonus
|
20.5%
|
2009
|
Sales + SEs
|
5k/sale ; split 75/25
|
41.0%
|
2010
|
SE’s only
|
2.5k / sale
|
35.2%
|
2011
|
SE’s only
|
1.25x quota credit
|
34.9%
|
2012
|
Sales only
|
1.5x quota credit
|
26.1%
|
2013
|
None
|
None
|
12.1%
|
There were also three different combinations who had differing opinions about the
efficiency and structure of SPIFFs. Those are the three shaded areas.
And The Analysis
By dividing the program into three different periods some
factors emerge.
1.
Reps are more motivated by quota credit than a
bonus (2007 and 2012 vs 2008)
2.
As soon as you add SE’s to the SPIFF,
performance rises quite dramatically from approx. 22% to 35%). That’s comparing
2007/8 to 2009-11.
3.
With just SE’s receiving a SPIFF you get better
performance than just Reps, but not as good as the 2009 team-based SPIFF which
yielded a 41% pull through.
4.
SPIFFS in general made a difference raising an average
13% pull through with no incentive to 31% with an incentive.
Now you can argue that the product upgrade or module
additions may have been better in some years than others, the economy changed,
personnel changed – and even that this was an upgrade into an installed base,
rather than net new logo sales. All perfectly valid points which are difficult
to prove or disprove, but unless you have something better and data to back it
up you are arguing emotion versus facts.
And my ultimate point – if you practice team-based selling
then you should practice team-based compensation and share the SPIFF. That’s where
the revenue is!
No comments:
Post a Comment